PURSE vs FIST, SATHI and SAIF: Which DST Research Scheme Should You Choose?

Which DST research-infrastructure scheme should you choose?

Choose PURSE if you are a performing, UGC-recognised university that can put up one consolidated, university-wide proposal for up to Rs 30 crore; choose FIST if a single department or centre needs basic enabling infrastructure; choose SATHI if the goal is a shared, professionally-run facility open to academia, startups and industry; and choose SAIF if researchers simply need access to sophisticated analytical instruments they do not own. This article compares PURSE against the sister schemes of DST's R&D Infrastructure division. For PURSE's full eligibility and budget, read the parent guide on PURSE: Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence. The one-line reminder: PURSE is institution-level, university-only, and awarded on NIRF rank, H-index and i10 index.

The decision at a glance

Scheme	Run by	Awarded to	Best for	Instrument
PURSE	DST R&D Infrastructure	Performing universities	Whole-university research capacity	Up to Rs 30 crore over 4 years, one consolidated proposal
FIST	DST R&D Infrastructure	Departments, centres, schools, colleges	Basic enabling infrastructure in a unit	Departmental infrastructure support
SATHI	DST R&D Infrastructure	Host institutes	A shared facility open to all users	Professionally-managed common S&T infrastructure
SAIF	DST R&D Infrastructure	Regional facilities	Instrument access for have-not institutions	Regional analytical-instrument facilities

All four sit under the same R&D Infrastructure division of the Department of Science & Technology, which is why they overlap in the mind, but they fund different units and different purposes.

PURSE vs FIST: whole university versus one department

The cleanest fork is the level of the applicant. PURSE is awarded to the university as an institution and demands a single consolidated, interdisciplinary proposal with broad participation across science and engineering departments. FIST works at the level of a department, centre, school or college, providing basic infrastructure and enabling facilities so that unit can pursue research more effectively. If your funding case is one department upgrading its labs, FIST fits; if it is the whole university consolidating its pockets of excellence, PURSE fits. A university strong enough for PURSE may still have individual departments better served by FIST.

PURSE vs SATHI: capacity-building versus shared facility

PURSE builds a university's own research capacity: its equipment (70% of the grant), manpower and consumables, even though facilities created must be mapped to the ISTEM portal for wider access. SATHI is designed from the start as a shared, professionally managed facility readily accessible to academia, startups, manufacturing units, industry and R&D labs. If your objective is a common-use hub that outside users book into, SATHI is the instrument; if it is strengthening your own faculty's research base, PURSE is. Note the cooling-off link: a university that drew SATHI (or SAIF or PURSE) support in the last 10 years is ineligible for PURSE, so the two cannot be stacked back-to-back.

PURSE vs SAIF: institution grant versus instrument access

SAIF is the most narrowly scoped of the four — regional Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facilities that let researchers, especially from institutions without such instruments, run analyses they otherwise could not. It gives access, not a capacity grant. PURSE gives a university money to build its own facilities. If your researchers only need occasional access to a mass spectrometer or NMR they cannot afford, SAIF is the route; if the university wants to own that capability, PURSE is.

Can a university hold more than one?

• PURSE and FIST: yes in principle, because FIST is departmental and PURSE is institutional, but a single expenditure cannot be funded twice, so the same equipment cannot be claimed under both.
• PURSE and SAIF: effectively complementary; SAIF gives instrument access, PURSE builds capacity, but PURSE's cooling-off rule bars a university that received SAIF support in the last 10 years, so check dates first.
• PURSE and SATHI: the 10-year cooling-off explicitly names SAIF, SATHI and PURSE together, so a recent SATHI grant blocks a PURSE application and vice versa. These are not held simultaneously by the same institution.

Which should you apply for first?

Sequence by scope. If one department has an urgent, contained infrastructure need, apply to FIST first, it is faster to justify than a university-wide case. If the whole university is a strong performer that clears the NIRF, H-index and i10 thresholds, build the PURSE proposal, mindful that it locks out SAIF/SATHI/PURSE for ten years. Use SATHI when the aim is a shared hub for the wider ecosystem, and SAIF when researchers only need instrument access. Verify the current terms and open calls on dst.gov.in before deciding, since thresholds and windows are revised between calls.

For PURSE specifically, watch dst.gov.in and onlinedst.gov.in for the next call; there is no fee and no agent is involved.